SCHG vs. QDVO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. SCHG is passively managed, while QDVO is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHG returned 24.64% vs 27.43% for QDVO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.

Performance

SCHG vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 9.80% return.

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

QDVO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 9.65%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	10.54%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	9.80%	20.16%	11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and QDVO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024	0.93

The correlation between SCHG and QDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. QDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHG	QDVO
Technology	46.3%	50.6%
Communication Services	16.0%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	12.5%
Healthcare	7.7%	4.6%
Financial Services	6.7%	4.1%
Industrials	5.8%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	6.3%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%
Energy	0.8%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Utilities	0.4%	0.7%

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 62
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHG	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.26	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.10	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	2.70	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	10.98	-5.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHG vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and QDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHG	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	2.26	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.41	-0.57

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-17.75%	-16.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-10.21%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-0.94%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-2.37%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	2.51%	+2.39%

Volatility

SCHG vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 2.89%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.89%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	8.87%	+2.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	12.22%	+3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.27%	17.44%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	17.44%	+4.11%

SCHG vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHG vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than QDVO's 10.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.12%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and QDVO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SCHG and QDVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHG or QDVO?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to QDVO (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs QDVO's -17.75%.

Which ETF is better, SCHG or QDVO?

On 1-year performance, QDVO leads with 27.43% vs 24.64% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QDVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHG or QDVO?

Over the 1-year period, QDVO has performed better with a 27.43% return vs 24.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHG or QDVO?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHG or QDVO?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.12%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SCHG and QDVO?

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.56% for QDVO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.