QDVO vs. GPIQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDVO returned 15.95% vs 24.16% for GPIQ. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 11.67% return.

QDVO

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: 6.01%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 1Y: 15.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.03%

GPIQ

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -2.85%
• 6M: 9.86%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 1Y: 24.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	$86.57M	$81.60M	$83.20M
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	$7.21M	$7.42M	$8.70M

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	6.27%	20.16%	9.76%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	11.67%	19.77%	7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and GPIQ is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	0.91

The correlation between QDVO and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDVO	GPIQ
Technology	50.7%	60.7%
Communication Services	14.3%	11.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	6.4%
Healthcare	6.0%	3.7%
Financial Services	3.7%	0.2%
Industrials	3.3%	4.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.1%
Utilities	0.5%	1.4%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

QDVO vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 43
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 60
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDVO	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.34	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.87	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.35	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.98	8.33	-3.34

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDVO	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-21.06%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-9.51%	-0.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-5.90%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-2.33%	-0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.68%	+0.20%

Volatility

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is 4.17%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that QDVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDVO	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	6.39%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	14.09%	-3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	16.69%	-3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	18.06%	-0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	18.06%	-0.67%

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDVO vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, more than GPIQ's 10.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.32%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.97%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDVO and GPIQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, QDVO and GPIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QDVO or GPIQ?

GPIQ has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to QDVO (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, QDVO or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 24.16% vs 15.95% for QDVO. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QDVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDVO or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 24.16% return vs 15.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDVO or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDVO or GPIQ?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.97%, compared with 9.32% for GPIQ.

What is the main difference between QDVO and GPIQ?

QDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.