QDVO vs. SPY
QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QDVO is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past year, QDVO returned 21.13% vs 23.59% for SPY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
QDVO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.15% return.
QDVO
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
QDVO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 5.51% | 20.16% | 9.76% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVO and SPY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QDVO and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDVO vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDVO
SPY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
QDVO
SPY
Communication Services
QDVO
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
QDVO
SPY
Consumer Defensive
QDVO
SPY
Healthcare
QDVO
SPY
Financial Services
QDVO
SPY
Industrials
QDVO
SPY
Basic Materials
QDVO
SPY
Energy
QDVO
SPY
Utilities
QDVO
SPY
Real Estate
QDVO
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
QDVO
SPY
QDVO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.67 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 11.92 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -55.19% | +37.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -8.88% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -3.17% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -9.04% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.98% | +0.64% |
Volatility
QDVO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is 4.47%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that QDVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.87% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 9.85% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 12.50% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 17.15% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 17.95% | -0.41% |
QDVO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 10.53% | 9.92% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVO and SPY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to QDVO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 1-year performance, SPY leads with 23.59% vs 21.13% for QDVO. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QDVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPY has performed better with a 23.59% return vs 21.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.
QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
QDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDVO and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer