SCHG vs. FMDE
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. SCHG is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHG returned 20.82% vs 17.86% for FMDE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
SCHG vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FMDE's 8.21% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 4.30% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 8.21% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and FMDE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SCHG and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
FMDE
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
FMDE
Communication Services
SCHG
FMDE
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
FMDE
Healthcare
SCHG
FMDE
Financial Services
SCHG
FMDE
Industrials
SCHG
FMDE
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
FMDE
Basic Materials
SCHG
FMDE
Energy
SCHG
FMDE
Real Estate
SCHG
FMDE
Utilities
SCHG
FMDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
FMDE
SCHG vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHG | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.15 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 8.49 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHG | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.28 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -21.10% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -8.33% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -2.19% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -2.64% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 2.11% | +2.80% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) at 3.52%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.52% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 10.03% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 13.75% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 16.15% | +6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 16.15% | +5.43% |
SCHG vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHG vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than FMDE's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and FMDE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FMDE (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
On 1-year performance, SCHG leads with 20.82% vs 17.86% for FMDE. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FMDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 20.82% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
FMDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.23% for FMDE.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer