PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMDE vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMDE vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.64% return.


FMDE

1D
-1.02%
1M
2.10%
YTD
10.32%
6M
9.12%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IJH

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.70%
YTD
14.64%
6M
12.56%
1Y
25.12%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMDE vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
10.32%12.19%21.76%9.09%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.64%7.42%13.92%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FMDE and IJH is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.94

The correlation between FMDE and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMDE vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMDE
IJH

Technology

23.3%
16.6%

Industrials

19.8%
25.9%

Financial Services

12.1%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
9.2%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.7%

Energy

5.7%
5.3%

Real Estate

5.1%
7.5%

Utilities

4.6%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
4.2%

Technology

FMDE
23.3%
IJH
16.6%

Industrials

FMDE
19.8%
IJH
25.9%

Financial Services

FMDE
12.1%
IJH
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FMDE
12.0%
IJH
9.2%

Healthcare

FMDE
7.6%
IJH
8.7%

Energy

FMDE
5.7%
IJH
5.3%

Real Estate

FMDE
5.1%
IJH
7.5%

Utilities

FMDE
4.6%
IJH
3.0%

Basic Materials

FMDE
4.3%
IJH
4.9%

Communication Services

FMDE
4.1%
IJH
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

FMDE
1.5%
IJH
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMDE vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMDE
FMDE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FMDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMDE vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMDEIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.86

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

10.44

-1.00

FMDE vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDE and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMDE vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMDEIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.10%

-55.07%

+33.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-8.83%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.13%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-7.55%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.41%

-0.29%

Volatility

FMDE vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMDEIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.75%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

11.75%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

15.88%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

19.76%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

21.17%

-5.00%

FMDE vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FMDE vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
1.10%1.23%1.11%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FMDE and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJH has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to FMDE (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDE dropped -21.10% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 1-year performance, IJH leads with 25.12% vs 19.98% for FMDE. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FMDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IJH has performed better with a 25.12% return vs 19.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.10% for FMDE.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FMDE and 0.05% for IJH.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMDE and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer