PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FMDE vs. CZA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMDE vs. CZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.55%
27.06%
FMDE
CZA

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 25.37% return, which is significantly higher than CZA's 16.70% return.


FMDE

YTD

25.37%

1M

2.80%

6M

13.13%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

CZA

YTD

16.70%

1M

-0.83%

6M

8.94%

1Y

27.43%

5Y (annualized)

9.04%

10Y (annualized)

9.65%

Key characteristics


FMDECZA
Daily Std Dev13.26%12.09%
Max Drawdown-6.79%-53.20%
Current Drawdown-2.29%-2.68%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMDE vs. CZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than CZA's 0.69% expense ratio.


CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for CZA: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for FMDE: current value at 0.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.23%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FMDE and CZA is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMDE vs. CZA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
FMDE
CZA

Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FMDE vs. CZA - Dividend Comparison

FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CZA's 1.17% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CZA
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
1.17%1.36%1.71%0.89%1.42%1.40%1.26%1.10%1.87%1.37%0.74%1.01%

Drawdowns

FMDE vs. CZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -6.79%, smaller than the maximum CZA drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and CZA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.29%
-2.68%
FMDE
CZA

Volatility

FMDE vs. CZA - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) have volatilities of 4.32% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.32%
4.12%
FMDE
CZA