PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 10.82%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.31% annualized return.


SCHF

1D
-3.15%
1M
0.55%
YTD
13.98%
6M
13.74%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%

EFAV

1D
-0.18%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
2.67%
6M
2.24%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
13.98%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
2.67%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and EFAV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.88

The correlation between SCHF and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHF vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
EFAV

Financial Services

23.3%
19.4%

Industrials

18.1%
15.9%

Technology

17.6%
4.6%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
5.0%

Healthcare

7.0%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
11.9%

Energy

4.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.6%
9.6%

Utilities

3.2%
8.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.0%

Financial Services

SCHF
23.3%
EFAV
19.4%

Industrials

SCHF
18.1%
EFAV
15.9%

Technology

SCHF
17.6%
EFAV
4.6%

Basic Materials

SCHF
7.4%
EFAV
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
7.3%
EFAV
5.0%

Healthcare

SCHF
7.0%
EFAV
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
5.7%
EFAV
11.9%

Energy

SCHF
4.7%
EFAV
8.3%

Communication Services

SCHF
3.6%
EFAV
9.6%

Utilities

SCHF
3.2%
EFAV
8.8%

Real Estate

SCHF
2.0%
EFAV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHFEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.28

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

3.26

+7.20

SCHF vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-27.56%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-6.66%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-8.75%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-27.46%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-27.56%

-7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-6.66%

+3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-4.77%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.61%

+0.38%

Volatility

SCHF vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 3.10%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

3.10%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

8.53%

+6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

10.57%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

11.82%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

13.06%

+3.99%

SCHF vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHF vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than EFAV's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.29%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
3.00%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHF and EFAV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to EFAV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 6.31% for EFAV. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 3.00% for SCHF.

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.20% for EFAV.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer