SCHD vs. GIS
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.65%/yr vs -3.08%/yr for GIS. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHD vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 12.65%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.08% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -26.51%
- 6M
- -25.64%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -22.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.08%
SCHD vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.51% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and GIS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
GIS
SCHD vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHD | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.74 | +0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.74 | -0.95 | +6.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.06 | -1.94 | +16.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHD | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | -1.52 | +3.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.40 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | -0.14 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.42 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -59.63% | +26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -37.97% | +33.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -55.56% | +39.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -59.63% | +42.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -59.63% | +26.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -58.42% | +56.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -10.27% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 18.63% | -16.75% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 6.96% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 18.58% | -10.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 23.84% | -12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 21.13% | -6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 22.09% | -5.37% |
Dividends
SCHD vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than GIS's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.36% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and GIS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs GIS's -59.63%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer