SCHD vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.72%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FNDF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SCHD vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 17.72% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 16.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHD having a 12.72% annualized return and FNDF not far behind at 12.17%.

SCHD

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: 17.72%
• 6M: 17.25%
• 1Y: 24.56%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

FNDF

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 16.43%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 39.04%
• 3Y*: 22.45%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	17.72%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	20.85%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	16.43%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and FNDF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and FNDF has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHD	FNDF
Technology	19.4%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	18.5%	6.5%
Healthcare	18.4%	5.2%
Energy	14.6%	10.9%
Financial Services	9.1%	16.2%
Industrials	7.4%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	10.8%
Communication Services	6.0%	4.9%
Basic Materials	1.2%	11.3%
Utilities	0.0%	3.5%
Real Estate	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

SCHD vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 76
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHD	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.43	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.16	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	3.70	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.94	13.74	-0.80

SCHD vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHD	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-40.14%	+6.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.61%	-10.60%	+5.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	-13.89%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	-25.56%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.37%	-40.14%	+6.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-4.59%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-7.62%	+4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	2.85%	-0.95%

Volatility

SCHD vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 3.58%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHD	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	6.77%	-3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	13.93%	-6.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.07%	16.16%	-5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	16.36%	-2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.71%	17.47%	-0.76%

SCHD vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHD vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than FNDF's 2.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.95%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.30%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHD and FNDF in my portfolio?

SCHD and FNDF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHD or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SCHD or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 12.17% for FNDF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHD or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHD or FNDF?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHD or FNDF?

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.95% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between SCHD and FNDF?

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.