PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 7.91%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
0.04%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
6.81%
6M
9.38%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.91%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
6.81%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and VEA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010

0.94

The correlation between SCHC and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
VEA

Industrials

22.4%
19.2%

Basic Materials

13.7%
7.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
7.5%

Technology

9.2%
13.8%

Real Estate

8.6%
2.7%

Energy

6.5%
5.4%

Healthcare

6.5%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.4%

Utilities

3.2%
3.3%

Industrials

SCHC
22.4%
VEA
19.2%

Basic Materials

SCHC
13.7%
VEA
7.5%

Financial Services

SCHC
12.6%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
10.0%
VEA
7.5%

Technology

SCHC
9.2%
VEA
13.8%

Real Estate

SCHC
8.6%
VEA
2.7%

Energy

SCHC
6.5%
VEA
5.4%

Healthcare

SCHC
6.5%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
4.1%
VEA
5.6%

Communication Services

SCHC
3.2%
VEA
3.4%

Utilities

SCHC
3.2%
VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHCVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.42

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

9.39

-2.36

SCHC vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHCVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.55

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.24

+0.15

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-60.68%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-11.63%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-13.45%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-29.71%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-35.73%

-8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-3.40%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-13.29%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.00%

+0.31%

Volatility

SCHC vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is 5.47%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that SCHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

6.03%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

13.91%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

16.15%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

16.63%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.40%

+0.62%

SCHC vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHC vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.43%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SCHC and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to SCHC (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.14% vs 7.91% for SCHC. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SCHC.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer