PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 7.91%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
0.04%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
6.81%
6M
9.38%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.91%

PXF

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
16.56%
6M
20.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
11.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
6.81%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
16.56%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and PXF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010

0.91

The correlation between SCHC and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
PXF

Industrials

22.4%
15.1%

Basic Materials

13.7%
10.1%

Financial Services

12.6%
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.2%

Technology

9.2%
11.4%

Real Estate

8.6%
1.8%

Energy

6.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

6.5%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
6.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

3.2%
3.6%

Industrials

SCHC
22.4%
PXF
15.1%

Basic Materials

SCHC
13.7%
PXF
10.1%

Financial Services

SCHC
12.6%
PXF
19.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
10.0%
PXF
10.2%

Technology

SCHC
9.2%
PXF
11.4%

Real Estate

SCHC
8.6%
PXF
1.8%

Energy

SCHC
6.5%
PXF
10.6%

Healthcare

SCHC
6.5%
PXF
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
4.1%
PXF
6.1%

Communication Services

SCHC
3.2%
PXF
4.3%

Utilities

SCHC
3.2%
PXF
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHCPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.55

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

13.49

-6.46

SCHC vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHCPXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.46

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.78

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.65

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.23

+0.16

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-64.74%

+20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-10.91%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-14.06%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-26.82%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-41.59%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-3.88%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-15.26%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.86%

+0.45%

Volatility

SCHC vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is 5.47%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that SCHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

6.06%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

13.53%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

15.80%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

16.54%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.07%

-0.05%

SCHC vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHC vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than PXF's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.18%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.43%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHC and PXF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to SCHC (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.69% vs 7.91% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 3.18% for PXF.

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.45% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer