SCHC vs. PRFZ
SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHC returned 8.48%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for PRFZ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHC charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PRFZ.
Performance
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than PRFZ's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed PRFZ with an annualized return of 8.48%, while PRFZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
PRFZ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 33.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 15.55% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and PRFZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SCHC and PRFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHC
PRFZ
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
SCHC
PRFZ
Basic Materials
SCHC
PRFZ
Financial Services
SCHC
PRFZ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHC
PRFZ
Technology
SCHC
PRFZ
Real Estate
SCHC
PRFZ
Energy
SCHC
PRFZ
Healthcare
SCHC
PRFZ
Consumer Defensive
SCHC
PRFZ
Communication Services
SCHC
PRFZ
Utilities
SCHC
PRFZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. PRFZ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
PRFZ
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHC | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.20 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 11.02 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum PRFZ drawdown of -62.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and PRFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -62.41% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -10.38% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -26.54% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -26.58% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | -44.28% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | 0.00% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -9.41% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.01% | +0.37% |
Volatility
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) at 5.92%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.92% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 12.93% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 18.33% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 21.38% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 22.46% | -4.44% |
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFZ's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHC vs. PRFZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than PRFZ's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHC and PRFZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PRFZ (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs PRFZ's -62.41%.
On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 8.48% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.
SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while PRFZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.39% for PRFZ.
PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHC and PRFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer