PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 8.35%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
-0.58%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
4.94%
6M
4.51%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
8.35%

HSCZ

1D
0.30%
1M
0.23%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.74%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
4.94%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.68%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and HSCZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.78

The correlation between SCHC and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
HSCZ

Industrials

16.1%
22.8%

Financial Services

13.1%
15.8%

Basic Materials

11.7%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.9%

Technology

6.7%
11.5%

Real Estate

5.0%
10.4%

Energy

4.4%
4.2%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.1%

Utilities

2.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.1%

Industrials

SCHC
16.1%
HSCZ
22.8%

Financial Services

SCHC
13.1%
HSCZ
15.8%

Basic Materials

SCHC
11.7%
HSCZ
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
7.4%
HSCZ
9.9%

Technology

SCHC
6.7%
HSCZ
11.5%

Real Estate

SCHC
5.0%
HSCZ
10.4%

Energy

SCHC
4.4%
HSCZ
4.2%

Healthcare

SCHC
3.7%
HSCZ
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
3.1%
HSCZ
3.1%

Utilities

SCHC
2.2%
HSCZ
2.2%

Communication Services

SCHC
2.2%
HSCZ
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHCHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.88

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

12.25

-6.76

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-34.89%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-9.61%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-12.81%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-20.11%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-34.89%

-9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-1.07%

-6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-4.63%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.26%

+1.21%

Volatility

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.93%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

3.93%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

9.71%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

11.63%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

13.52%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.47%

+2.38%

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHC vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than HSCZ's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.94%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.49%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHC and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHC has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to HSCZ (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 10-year performance, HSCZ leads with 12.57% vs 8.35% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.94% for HSCZ.

SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index, while HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for SCHC and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer