HSCZ vs. HEFA
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while HEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ returned 12.70%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for HEFA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HEFA.
Performance
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly lower than HEFA's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has underperformed HEFA with an annualized return of 12.70%, while HEFA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
HEFA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 11.88% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 17.75% | 6.40% | 27.89% | -13.99% | 24.52% |
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 13.93% | 24.58% | 13.71% | 20.33% | -4.86% | 19.59% | 2.09% | 27.63% | -9.33% | 16.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and HEFA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between HSCZ and HEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSCZ
HEFA
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
HSCZ
HEFA
Financial Services
HSCZ
HEFA
Technology
HSCZ
HEFA
Real Estate
HSCZ
HEFA
Basic Materials
HSCZ
HEFA
Consumer Cyclical
HSCZ
HEFA
Energy
HSCZ
HEFA
Healthcare
HSCZ
HEFA
Consumer Defensive
HSCZ
HEFA
Communication Services
HSCZ
HEFA
Utilities
HSCZ
HEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
HEFA
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | HEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.39 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 14.21 | -0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, which is greater than HEFA's maximum drawdown of -32.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and HEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | HEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -32.39% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -9.52% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -14.28% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -14.79% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -32.39% | -2.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -4.15% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.27% | -0.02% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 3.66%, while iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | HEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 4.16% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 10.67% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 13.02% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 13.85% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 15.84% | -0.28% |
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than HEFA's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.86% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.91% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and HEFA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEFA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to HSCZ (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs HEFA's -32.39%.
On 10-year performance, HEFA leads with 13.63% vs 12.70% for HSCZ. On fees, HEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.
HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.91% for HSCZ.
HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while HEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.35% for HEFA.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and HEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer