HSCZ vs. ISVL
HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) and ISVL (iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ISVL is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSCZ returned 11.52%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for ISVL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSCZ charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ISVL.
Performance
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than ISVL's 9.12% return.
HSCZ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 11.88%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
ISVL
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- —
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 11.88% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | -11.46% | 9.69% |
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 9.12% | 42.84% | 4.58% | 17.56% | -13.69% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSCZ and ISVL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between HSCZ and ISVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSCZ
ISVL
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
HSCZ
ISVL
Financial Services
HSCZ
ISVL
Technology
HSCZ
ISVL
Real Estate
HSCZ
ISVL
Basic Materials
HSCZ
ISVL
Consumer Cyclical
HSCZ
ISVL
Energy
HSCZ
ISVL
Healthcare
HSCZ
ISVL
Consumer Defensive
HSCZ
ISVL
Communication Services
HSCZ
ISVL
Utilities
HSCZ
ISVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSCZ vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank
HSCZ
ISVL
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSCZ | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.39 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 9.34 | +4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, which is greater than ISVL's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and ISVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSCZ | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.89% | -30.48% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -12.48% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -12.93% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -30.48% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.56% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -6.61% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.19% | -0.94% |
Volatility
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 3.66%, while iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSCZ | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 4.43% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 12.45% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 14.79% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 16.92% | -3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 16.77% | -1.21% |
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVL's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSCZ vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison
HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than ISVL's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.91% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 3.16% | 2.69% | 3.92% | 3.82% | 3.37% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSCZ and ISVL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISVL has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to HSCZ (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs ISVL's -30.48%.
On 5-year performance, HSCZ leads with 11.52% vs 11.08% for ISVL. On fees, ISVL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 11.52% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISVL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.
ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 2.91% for HSCZ.
HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while ISVL is Small Cap Value Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.30% for ISVL.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSCZ and ISVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer