PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSCZ vs. HEWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSCZ achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, HSCZ has underperformed HEWJ with an annualized return of 12.70%, while HEWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.92% annualized return.


HSCZ

1D
0.15%
1M
1.31%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.30%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
12.70%

HEWJ

1D
0.98%
1M
8.32%
YTD
26.51%
6M
27.05%
1Y
61.45%
3Y*
30.43%
5Y*
22.84%
10Y*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
11.88%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
26.51%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HSCZ and HEWJ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.74

The correlation between HSCZ and HEWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSCZ
HEWJ

Industrials

22.8%
22.8%

Financial Services

15.8%
17.9%

Technology

11.5%
23.5%

Real Estate

10.4%
1.9%

Basic Materials

10.3%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
11.1%

Energy

4.2%
0.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.1%
6.4%

Utilities

2.2%
1.0%

Industrials

HSCZ
22.8%
HEWJ
22.8%

Financial Services

HSCZ
15.8%
HEWJ
17.9%

Technology

HSCZ
11.5%
HEWJ
23.5%

Real Estate

HSCZ
10.4%
HEWJ
1.9%

Basic Materials

HSCZ
10.3%
HEWJ
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HSCZ
9.9%
HEWJ
11.1%

Energy

HSCZ
4.2%
HEWJ
0.9%

Healthcare

HSCZ
3.7%
HEWJ
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

HSCZ
3.1%
HEWJ
3.3%

Communication Services

HSCZ
3.1%
HEWJ
6.4%

Utilities

HSCZ
2.2%
HEWJ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSCZ vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSCZHEWJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.57

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

5.95

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

23.05

-9.60

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSCZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the HEWJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSCZ and HEWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSCZ drawdown since its inception was -34.89%, which is greater than HEWJ's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSCZ and HEWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSCZHEWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.89%

-31.53%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-10.37%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-20.90%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-20.90%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

-31.53%

-3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-6.59%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.67%

-0.42%

Volatility

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) is 3.66%, while iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that HSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSCZHEWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

6.25%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

14.70%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

19.39%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

19.19%

-5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

19.63%

-4.07%

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSCZ has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSCZ vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison

HSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than HEWJ's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.03%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.91%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSCZ and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEWJ has higher volatility (6.25%) compared to HSCZ (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSCZ dropped -34.89% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.92% vs 12.70% for HSCZ. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.92% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.91% for HSCZ.

HSCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while HEWJ is Japan Equities. HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for HSCZ and 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSCZ and HEWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer