SCHA vs. VTWO
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index while VTWO tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.72%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for VTWO. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTWO.
Performance
SCHA vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly higher than VTWO's 20.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 11.72% annualized return and VTWO not far ahead at 11.73%.
SCHA
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 6M
- 20.00%
- 1Y
- 41.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
VTWO
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 41.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
SCHA vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.53% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 20.53% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and VTWO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SCHA and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
VTWO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
SCHA
VTWO
Financial Services
SCHA
VTWO
Industrials
SCHA
VTWO
Healthcare
SCHA
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
VTWO
Real Estate
SCHA
VTWO
Energy
SCHA
VTWO
Basic Materials
SCHA
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
VTWO
Communication Services
SCHA
VTWO
Utilities
SCHA
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
VTWO
SCHA vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.77 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.18 | 13.36 | +2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -41.19% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -10.99% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -27.57% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -31.88% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -41.19% | -1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.94% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -8.36% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.10% | -0.51% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) have volatilities of 6.71% and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 6.57% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 14.28% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 19.68% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 22.56% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 23.11% | -0.36% |
SCHA vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VTWO's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.10% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SCHA and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VTWO (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 11.73% vs 11.72% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTWO.
VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.98% for SCHA.
SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.06% for VTWO.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer