SCHA vs. MDY
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) and MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index while MDY tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHA returned 11.13%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for MDY. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHA charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MDY.
Performance
SCHA vs. MDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than MDY's 13.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHA having a 11.13% annualized return and MDY not far behind at 11.04%.
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
MDY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
SCHA vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 13.91% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and MDY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCHA and MDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHA vs. MDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHA
MDY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
SCHA
MDY
Financial Services
SCHA
MDY
Industrials
SCHA
MDY
Healthcare
SCHA
MDY
Consumer Cyclical
SCHA
MDY
Real Estate
SCHA
MDY
Energy
SCHA
MDY
Basic Materials
SCHA
MDY
Consumer Defensive
SCHA
MDY
Communication Services
SCHA
MDY
Utilities
SCHA
MDY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
MDY
SCHA vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHA | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 1.63 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 2.39 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 2.85 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.66 | 10.38 | +5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHA | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.63 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum MDY drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and MDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -55.33% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -8.82% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -24.03% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -24.03% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | -42.22% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.09% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -7.03% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.42% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) at 4.33%. This indicates that SCHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.33% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 11.28% | +1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 15.48% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 19.77% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 21.19% | +1.52% |
SCHA vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHA has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHA vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than MDY's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCHA and MDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to MDY (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs MDY's -55.33%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.13% vs 11.04% for MDY. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.
SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index, while MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHA and 0.23% for MDY.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and MDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer