SCHA vs. KULR
SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SCHA returned 7.49%/yr vs -30.52%/yr for KULR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHA vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHA achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than KULR's -6.76% return.
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.45%
KULR
- 1D
- 4.94%
- 1M
- -30.30%
- 6M
- -33.97%
- YTD
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- -60.00%
- 3Y*
- -29.83%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.48%
SCHA vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.43% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -19.09% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | -6.76% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 136.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHA and KULR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, SCHA and KULR have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHA vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
SCHA
KULR
SCHA vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHA | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.93 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | -0.85 | +4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.38 | -1.22 | +12.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHA vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHA drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHA and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHA | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -97.23% | +54.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -71.06% | +61.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -94.74% | +67.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | -96.86% | +66.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -92.81% | +86.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.54% | -66.54% | +59.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 49.07% | -46.30% |
Volatility
SCHA vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) is 5.84%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 27.42%. This indicates that SCHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHA | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 27.42% | -21.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.41% | 75.15% | -60.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 98.43% | -79.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 126.48% | -104.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 126.74% | -104.00% |
Dividends
SCHA vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.06% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHA and KULR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (27.42%) compared to SCHA (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHA dropped -42.41% vs KULR's -97.23%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHA and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer