SCCR vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). SCCR is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. Over the past year, SCCR returned 5.53% vs 43.94% for FNDF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCCR charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SCCR vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.97% return.

SCCR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: 5.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCR vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	0.44%	6.66%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.97%	34.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and FNDF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.31

SCCR vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCCR	FNDF
Financial Services	13.2%	16.7%
Industrials	6.9%	15.9%
Technology	3.4%	11.1%
Healthcare	3.1%	5.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.9%
Communication Services	2.3%	4.9%
Energy	1.9%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	10.7%
Basic Materials	0.7%	11.3%
Utilities	0.7%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	6.9%

Return for Risk

SCCR vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCR

SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 42
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCR vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCCR	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.94	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.83	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.52	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	4.17	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	15.91	-9.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCCR vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCCR	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.94	-1.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.54	+0.69

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCR	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-40.14%	+37.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-10.60%	+7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.87%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-7.64%	+6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	2.77%	-1.84%

Volatility

SCCR vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) is 1.28%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that SCCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCR	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	5.10%	-3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	12.53%	-9.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75%	15.04%	-11.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.38%	16.18%	-11.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.38%	17.67%	-13.29%

SCCR vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCCR vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	4.63%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCR and FNDF in my portfolio?

SCCR and FNDF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCCR or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SCCR (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SCCR or FNDF?

On 1-year performance, FNDF leads with 43.94% vs 5.53% for SCCR. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, SCCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCCR or FNDF?

Over the 1-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 43.94% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCCR or FNDF?

SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCCR or FNDF?

SCCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 2.84% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between SCCR and FNDF?

SCCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.