PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCCR vs. ICSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCCR vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.55% return.


SCCR

1D
0.20%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.71%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICSH

1D
0.04%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.72%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCR vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and ICSH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCCR vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCR
SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ICSH
ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCR vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCCRICSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-20.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

5.60

-4.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

42.20

-40.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

238.45

-233.23

SCCR vs. ICSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the ICSH Sharpe Ratio of 10.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and ICSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum ICSH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and ICSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCCRICSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-3.94%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-0.10%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.05%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-0.08%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.02%

+0.97%

Volatility

SCCR vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that SCCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCCRICSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.16%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

0.32%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

0.41%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

0.49%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

1.06%

+3.31%

SCCR vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCCR vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than ICSH's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.34%4.55%5.24%4.78%1.66%0.42%1.21%2.61%2.20%1.36%0.88%0.54%
SCCR
Schwab Core Bond ETF
4.62%3.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCCR and ICSH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCCR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to ICSH (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs ICSH's -3.94%.

On 1-year performance, SCCR leads with 5.16% vs 4.15% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCCR has performed better with a 5.16% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for SCCR.

SCCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.34% for ICSH.

SCCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.08% for ICSH.

ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.20 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCCR and ICSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer