SCCR vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCCR (Schwab Core Bond ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCCR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. SCCR is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Over the past year, SCCR returned 5.16% vs 30.33% for FNDX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCCR charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.

Performance

SCCR vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCR achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.31% return.

SCCR

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 13.73%
• 1Y: 30.33%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: 14.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCCR vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	0.52%	7.00%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.31%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SCCR and FNDX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

SCCR vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCR

SCCR Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCCR Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SCCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SCCR Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCR vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCCR	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.92	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	4.05	-1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.53	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	5.02	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.22	19.42	-14.20

SCCR vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCR and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCCR vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCR drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCR and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCR	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-37.72%	+34.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-6.06%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-1.43%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	-3.55%	+2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	1.57%	-0.58%

Volatility

SCCR vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Core Bond ETF (SCCR) is 1.06%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that SCCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCR	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	3.33%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	7.63%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	10.47%	-6.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	15.18%	-10.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.37%	17.48%	-13.11%

SCCR vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCCR has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCCR vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SCCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
SCCR Schwab Core Bond ETF	4.62%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCCR and FNDX in my portfolio?

SCCR and FNDX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCCR or FNDX?

FNDX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to SCCR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCR dropped -2.81% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which ETF is better, SCCR or FNDX?

On 1-year performance, FNDX leads with 30.33% vs 5.16% for SCCR. On fees, SCCR is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, SCCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCCR or FNDX?

Over the 1-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 30.33% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCCR or FNDX?

SCCR is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCCR or FNDX?

SCCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

What is the main difference between SCCR and FNDX?

SCCR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for SCCR and 0.25% for FNDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.