SBSW vs. FLKR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SBSW (Sibanye Stillwater Limited) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, SBSW returned -9.31%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SBSW vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBSW achieves a -41.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 67.26% return.

SBSW

• 1D: -4.92%
• 1M: -24.54%
• 6M: -51.50%
• YTD: -41.36%
• 1Y: -2.73%
• 3Y*: 5.71%
• 5Y*: -9.31%
• 10Y*: -4.03%

FLKR

• 1D: -5.00%
• 1M: -19.17%
• 6M: 47.28%
• YTD: 67.26%
• 1Y: 123.98%
• 3Y*: 37.53%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBSW vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited	-41.36%	331.82%	-39.23%	-46.54%	-9.57%	-12.44%	61.55%	250.88%	-41.72%	-8.35%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	67.26%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SBSW and FLKR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.31

Return for Risk

SBSW vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBSW

SBSW Risk / Return Rank: 43
SBSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SBSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SBSW Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SBSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SBSW Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBSW vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBSW	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	2.45	-2.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	2.71	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.39	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	4.83	-4.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	15.83	-15.93

SBSW vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBSW and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SBSW vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBSW drawdown since its inception was -89.24%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBSW and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBSW	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.24%	-50.06%	-39.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.44%	-25.80%	-34.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.44%	-26.39%	-34.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.53%	-47.97%	-34.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.44%	-25.80%	-34.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.27%	-21.94%	-26.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.96%	7.86%	+21.10%

Volatility

SBSW vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) is 14.10%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 22.94%. This indicates that SBSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBSW	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.10%	22.94%	-8.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.11%	48.07%	+3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.82%	50.91%	+16.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.12%	31.38%	+28.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.14%	29.33%	+34.81%

Dividends

SBSW vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

SBSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than FLKR's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.76%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited	4.04%	0.00%	0.00%	6.98%	7.68%	13.34%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	2.68%	5.12%	3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBSW and FLKR in my portfolio?

SBSW and FLKR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBSW or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (22.94%) compared to SBSW (14.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBSW dropped -89.24% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.