SBSW vs. NEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SBSW or NEM.
Key characteristics
| SBSW | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -25.23% | 0.14% |
| 1Y Return | -23.25% | 15.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -32.14% | -8.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.68% | 4.82% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.17% | 10.25% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.37 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.13 | 0.82 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 1.11 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.29 | 0.26 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.18 | 1.36 |
| Ulcer Index | 20.30% | 11.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 65.31% | 37.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.67% | -77.75% |
| Current Drawdown | -77.70% | -47.81% |
Fundamentals
| SBSW | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.97B | $48.19B |
| EPS | -$4.15 | -$2.15 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $81.76B | $16.84B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $6.29B | $3.84B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $6.88B | $6.78B |
Correlation
The correlation between SBSW and NEM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SBSW vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SBSW achieves a -25.23% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SBSW has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 2.17%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SBSW vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SBSW vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
SBSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited | 0.00% | 6.96% | 7.68% | 13.34% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.76% | 10.25% | 6.12% | 9.44% | 4.88% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 2.83% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 1.19% | 5.32% |
Drawdowns
SBSW vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBSW drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBSW and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SBSW vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) has a higher volatility of 24.51% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 17.47%. This indicates that SBSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SBSW vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sibanye Stillwater Limited and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities