SBSW vs. NEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM).
Performance
SBSW vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBSW vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited | -10.38% | 331.82% | -39.23% | -46.54% | -9.57% | -12.44% | 61.55% | 250.88% | -41.72% | -26.00% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 14.19% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Fundamentals
SBSW:
-$17.51
NEM:
$7.91
SBSW:
0.04
NEM:
5.41
SBSW:
$238.26B
NEM:
$15.51B
SBSW:
$50.42B
NEM:
$7.14B
SBSW:
$23.43B
NEM:
$13.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBSW achieves a -10.38% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 14.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SBSW has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 1.40%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.
SBSW
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -24.84%
- YTD
- -10.38%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 182.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- 1.40%
NEM
- 1D
- 5.12%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 33.04%
- 1Y
- 138.70%
- 3Y*
- 35.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBSW vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
SBSW
NEM
SBSW vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBSW | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 3.02 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.65 | 3.05 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 5.09 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | 16.88 | -5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBSW | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 3.02 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.45 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.52 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.13 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBSW and NEM is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SBSW vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
SBSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than NEM's 0.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBSW Sibanye Stillwater Limited | 2.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.98% | 7.68% | 13.34% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.68% | 5.12% | 3.05% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 0.89% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
SBSW vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBSW drawdown since its inception was -89.24%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBSW and NEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBSW | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.24% | -81.30% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.72% | -27.25% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.53% | -62.40% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.24% | -62.40% | -26.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.53% | -13.59% | -25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -41.49% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.45% | 8.22% | +7.23% |
Volatility
SBSW vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) has a higher volatility of 20.35% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 14.22%. This indicates that SBSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBSW | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.35% | 14.22% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.93% | 37.77% | +15.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.65% | 46.28% | +26.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.23% | 36.92% | +22.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.18% | 35.68% | +28.50% |
Financials
SBSW vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sibanye Stillwater Limited and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities