SBSW vs. GOLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SBSW or GOLD.
Correlation
The correlation between SBSW and GOLD is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
SBSW vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SBSW:
-0.56
GOLD:
-0.19
SBSW:
-0.54
GOLD:
-0.04
SBSW:
0.94
GOLD:
0.99
SBSW:
-0.42
GOLD:
-0.09
SBSW:
-1.60
GOLD:
-0.58
SBSW:
21.50%
GOLD:
11.11%
SBSW:
61.91%
GOLD:
33.49%
SBSW:
-83.67%
GOLD:
-88.51%
SBSW:
-81.49%
GOLD:
-63.57%
Fundamentals
SBSW:
$2.92B
GOLD:
$27.15B
SBSW:
-$4.10
GOLD:
$0.92
SBSW:
$55.20B
GOLD:
$9.69B
SBSW:
$7.14B
GOLD:
$3.44B
SBSW:
$4.74B
GOLD:
$4.78B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SBSW having a 2.12% return and GOLD slightly higher at 2.19%. Over the past 10 years, SBSW has underperformed GOLD with an annualized return of -1.27%, while GOLD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.39% annualized return.
SBSW
2.12%
-17.40%
-31.22%
-34.31%
-16.00%
-1.27%
GOLD
2.19%
-8.81%
-8.20%
-6.54%
-0.48%
5.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SBSW vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) and Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SBSW vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison
SBSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sibanye Stillwater Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.96% | 7.68% | 13.34% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.76% | 10.25% | 6.12% | 9.44% |
Barrick Gold Corporation | 2.53% | 2.58% | 2.21% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 1.36% | 0.70% | 1.40% | 0.83% | 0.50% | 1.89% | 1.86% |
Drawdowns
SBSW vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBSW drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, smaller than the maximum GOLD drawdown of -88.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBSW and GOLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SBSW vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) has a higher volatility of 14.77% compared to Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) at 8.84%. This indicates that SBSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SBSW vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sibanye Stillwater Limited and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with SBSW or GOLD
Recent discussions
Market filter for screeners
Scott Allen
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca
VUG vs FOCPX
FOCPX vs VUG is absolutely incorrect. I ran the same comparison on Morning star and FOCPX has out performed but your graph shows the opposite.
what is the source of this data. is it trust worthy.
SK