PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBLK vs. STNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBLK vs. STNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 41.89% return, which is significantly lower than STNG's 57.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SBLK has outperformed STNG with an annualized return of 29.24%, while STNG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.38% annualized return.


SBLK

1D
1.82%
1M
-1.13%
6M
38.85%
YTD
41.89%
1Y
48.44%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
17.99%
10Y*
29.24%

STNG

1D
4.03%
1M
4.14%
6M
46.43%
YTD
57.90%
1Y
79.55%
3Y*
24.33%
5Y*
34.53%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBLK vs. STNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
41.89%30.76%-21.04%19.24%8.50%185.15%-24.77%29.82%-18.83%120.35%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
57.90%6.03%-16.29%15.40%325.48%17.40%-70.74%127.09%-41.26%-31.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SBLK and STNG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBLK:

$2.94B

STNG:

$3.95B

EPS

SBLK:

$1.25

STNG:

$10.16

PE Ratio

SBLK:

21.00

STNG:

7.80

PS Ratio

SBLK:

2.73

STNG:

3.78

PB Ratio

SBLK:

1.21

STNG:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBLK:

$1.09B

STNG:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBLK:

$377.07M

STNG:

$536.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBLK:

$377.39M

STNG:

$590.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBLK vs. STNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLK
SBLK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SBLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLK Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

STNG
STNG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
STNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
STNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBLK vs. STNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBLKSTNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.49

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

8.91

-0.86

SBLK vs. STNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the STNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLK and STNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBLK vs. STNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than STNG's maximum drawdown of -91.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and STNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBLKSTNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.76%

-91.13%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-22.74%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.44%

-60.97%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-60.97%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.77%

-81.67%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.60%

-8.12%

-85.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.73%

-49.15%

-33.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

8.90%

-2.35%

Volatility

SBLK vs. STNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is 10.44%, while Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that SBLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBLKSTNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

12.53%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.70%

28.31%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.33%

38.59%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.70%

45.01%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.07%

54.21%

-2.14%

Dividends

SBLK vs. STNG - Dividend Comparison

SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than STNG's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
3.91%1.56%16.72%7.38%33.80%9.93%0.57%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
2.17%3.19%3.22%1.73%0.74%3.12%3.57%1.02%2.27%1.31%11.04%6.17%

Financials

SBLK vs. STNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and Scorpio Tankers Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
281.15M
312.86M
(SBLK) Total Revenue
(STNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SBLK vs. STNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and Scorpio Tankers Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.1%
61.6%
Portfolio components
SBLK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 92.95M and revenue of 281.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

STNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a gross profit of 192.73M and revenue of 312.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

SBLK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 73.02M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.

STNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported an operating income of 153.59M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

SBLK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 58.53M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.

STNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a net income of 216.26M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in a net margin of 69.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBLK and STNG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STNG has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to SBLK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLK dropped -99.76% vs STNG's -91.13%.

STNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBLK and STNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer