SBLK vs. SB
SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) and SB (Safe Bulkers, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SBLK returned 29.20%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for SB. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SBLK vs. SB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 54.81% return, which is significantly lower than SB's 64.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SBLK has outperformed SB with an annualized return of 29.20%, while SB has yielded a comparatively lower 24.44% annualized return.
SBLK
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- 6M
- 29.65%
- YTD
- 54.81%
- 1Y
- 62.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.92%
- 10Y*
- 29.20%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.41%
SB
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 22.03%
- 6M
- 39.14%
- YTD
- 64.83%
- 1Y
- 107.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.09%
- 5Y*
- 23.78%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.69M | $6.75M | $5.74M | |
| $36.73M | $32.98M | $35.30M |
SBLK vs. SB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 54.81% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 185.15% | -24.77% | 29.82% | -18.83% | 120.35% |
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 64.83% | 41.65% | -5.15% | 42.94% | -18.68% | 190.00% | -23.53% | -4.49% | -44.89% | 180.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBLK and SB is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2008 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SBLK and SB shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SBLK:
$3.21B
SB:
$795.27M
SBLK:
$1.25
SB:
$0.85
SBLK:
22.91
SB:
9.17
SBLK:
2.98
SB:
2.59
SBLK:
1.32
SB:
0.91
SBLK:
$1.09B
SB:
$307.50M
SBLK:
$377.07M
SB:
$136.03M
SBLK:
$377.39M
SB:
$167.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBLK vs. SB — Risk / Return Rank
SBLK
SB
SBLK vs. SB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBLK | SB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 7.27 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 19.31 | -9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBLK vs. SB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, roughly equal to the maximum SB drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and SB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBLK | SB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.76% | -97.38% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -14.73% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.44% | -49.71% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -52.55% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.77% | -78.46% | +4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.01% | -16.15% | -76.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.76% | -62.78% | -19.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | 5.54% | +1.07% |
Volatility
SBLK vs. SB - Volatility Comparison
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) at 10.85%. This indicates that SBLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBLK | SB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.52% | 10.85% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.80% | 27.29% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.63% | 33.74% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 41.35% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.77% | 55.11% | -3.34% |
Dividends
SBLK vs. SB - Dividend Comparison
SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than SB's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 2.69% | 4.15% | 5.60% | 5.09% | 6.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.58% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SBLK vs. SB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and Safe Bulkers, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBLK vs. SB - Profitability Comparison
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 92.95M and revenue of 281.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
SB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.04M and revenue of 87.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.2%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 73.02M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
SB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.91M and revenue of 87.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.1%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 58.53M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.
SB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a net income of 35.16M and revenue of 87.46M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBLK and SB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBLK has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to SB (10.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLK dropped -99.76% vs SB's -97.38%.
SB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBLK and SB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer