SBLK vs. ZIM
Compare and contrast key facts about Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM).
Performance
SBLK vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBLK vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 25.00% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 146.85% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 26.36% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Fundamentals
SBLK:
$2.70B
ZIM:
$3.13B
SBLK:
$0.73
ZIM:
$3.98
SBLK:
32.25
ZIM:
6.53
SBLK:
2.60
ZIM:
0.45
SBLK:
1.10
ZIM:
0.78
SBLK:
$1.04B
ZIM:
$6.90B
SBLK:
$344.33M
ZIM:
$1.16B
SBLK:
$318.33M
ZIM:
$2.27B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 26.36% return.
SBLK
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- 25.00%
- 6M
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 54.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 23.74%
- 10Y*
- 27.31%
ZIM
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -6.95%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 98.68%
- 1Y
- 84.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.15%
- 5Y*
- 32.56%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBLK vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
SBLK
ZIM
SBLK vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBLK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.35 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 2.21 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.94 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | 6.61 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBLK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.35 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.80 | -0.99 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBLK and ZIM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SBLK vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than ZIM's 7.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 2.45% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 7.67% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SBLK vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and ZIM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBLK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.76% | -84.68% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.11% | -32.64% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -84.68% | +36.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.36% | -8.35% | -86.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.59% | -41.09% | -41.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 14.50% | -7.69% |
Volatility
SBLK vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 9.13%. This indicates that SBLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBLK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.72% | 9.13% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.65% | 40.49% | -17.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.90% | 63.26% | -28.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.05% | 67.37% | -22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.71% | 68.50% | -14.79% |
Financials
SBLK vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBLK vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 104.73M and revenue of 300.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 81.66M and revenue of 300.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.2%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 65.15M and revenue of 300.59M, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.