PortfoliosLab logo
SBLK vs. ZIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SBLK and ZIM is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SBLK vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SBLK:

-0.81

ZIM:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

SBLK:

-0.98

ZIM:

1.32

Omega Ratio

SBLK:

0.88

ZIM:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

SBLK:

-0.30

ZIM:

0.82

Martin Ratio

SBLK:

-1.01

ZIM:

2.67

Ulcer Index

SBLK:

28.44%

ZIM:

18.36%

Daily Std Dev

SBLK:

36.88%

ZIM:

78.30%

Max Drawdown

SBLK:

-99.74%

ZIM:

-84.68%

Current Drawdown

SBLK:

-95.86%

ZIM:

-34.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBLK:

$1.96B

ZIM:

$2.20B

EPS

SBLK:

$2.73

ZIM:

$17.58

PE Ratio

SBLK:

6.01

ZIM:

1.03

PS Ratio

SBLK:

1.59

ZIM:

0.26

PB Ratio

SBLK:

0.79

ZIM:

0.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBLK:

$1.01B

ZIM:

$6.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBLK:

$324.01M

ZIM:

$2.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

SBLK:

$413.20M

ZIM:

$3.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 3.85% return.


SBLK

YTD

10.35%

1M

21.03%

6M

-15.69%

1Y

-29.69%

5Y*

45.27%

10Y*

6.08%

ZIM

YTD

3.85%

1M

35.98%

6M

2.38%

1Y

49.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SBLK vs. ZIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBLK is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBLK is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBLK is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBLK is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBLK is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBLK is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SBLK vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SBLK Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLK and ZIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SBLK vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%, less than ZIM's 43.54% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
13.05%16.72%7.38%33.80%9.93%0.57%0.42%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
43.54%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SBLK vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and ZIM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SBLK vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is 7.35%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 22.13%. This indicates that SBLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SBLK vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
308.92M
2.17B
(SBLK) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SBLK vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
24.0%
33.7%
(SBLK) Gross Margin
(ZIM) Gross Margin
SBLK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 74.11M and revenue of 308.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 731.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

SBLK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 62.23M and revenue of 308.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 657.60M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

SBLK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 42.45M and revenue of 308.92M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 561.50M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.