SBLK vs. ZIM
Compare and contrast key facts about Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SBLK or ZIM.
Key characteristics
| SBLK | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.79% | 89.77% |
| 1Y Return | 47.24% | 4.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.49% | 3.25% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.67 | 0.09 |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.47% | 71.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.74% | -84.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -94.07% | -56.45% |
Fundamentals
| SBLK | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.95B | $2.25B |
| EPS | $1.75 | -$22.42 |
| PE Ratio | 14.89 | 0.66 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $949.27M | $5.16B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $830.31M | $7.80B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $334.84M | -$369.10M |
Correlation
The correlation between SBLK and ZIM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SBLK vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 24.79% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 89.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SBLK vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SBLK vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, while ZIM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 5.45% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 0.00% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SBLK vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and ZIM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SBLK vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is 7.97%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 21.73%. This indicates that SBLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SBLK vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities