PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBLK vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBLK vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBLK achieves a 41.89% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 98.85% return.


SBLK

1D
1.82%
1M
-1.13%
6M
38.85%
YTD
41.89%
1Y
48.44%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
17.99%
10Y*
29.24%

INSW

1D
6.63%
1M
13.42%
6M
77.43%
YTD
98.85%
1Y
149.26%
3Y*
48.58%
5Y*
51.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBLK vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
41.89%30.76%-21.04%19.24%8.50%185.15%-24.77%29.82%-18.83%120.35%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
98.85%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SBLK and INSW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.39

The correlation between SBLK and INSW shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBLK:

$2.94B

INSW:

$4.38B

EPS

SBLK:

$1.25

INSW:

$11.00

PE Ratio

SBLK:

21.00

INSW:

8.05

PS Ratio

SBLK:

2.73

INSW:

6.50

PB Ratio

SBLK:

1.21

INSW:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBLK:

$1.09B

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBLK:

$377.07M

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBLK:

$377.39M

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBLK vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBLK
SBLK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SBLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLK Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBLK vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBLKINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.54

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

9.38

-6.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

25.88

-17.83

SBLK vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBLK and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBLK vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBLK drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBLK and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBLKINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.76%

-57.49%

-42.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-16.16%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.44%

-50.40%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-50.40%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.60%

-1.67%

-91.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.73%

-20.78%

-61.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

5.85%

+0.70%

Volatility

SBLK vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) is 10.44%, while International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that SBLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBLKINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

16.78%

-6.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.70%

29.47%

-5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.33%

38.18%

-7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.70%

41.38%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.07%

45.41%

+6.66%

Dividends

SBLK vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

SBLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than INSW's 9.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
9.41%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
3.91%1.56%16.72%7.38%33.80%9.93%0.57%0.42%

Financials

SBLK vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Star Bulk Carriers Corp. and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
281.15M
15.96M
(SBLK) Total Revenue
(INSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBLK and INSW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to SBLK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBLK dropped -99.76% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBLK and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer