PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSW vs. CVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSW vs. CVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 116.16% return, which is significantly higher than CVI's 42.62% return.


INSW

1D
1.02%
1M
16.72%
6M
75.93%
YTD
116.16%
1Y
169.94%
3Y*
47.43%
5Y*
56.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.02%

CVI

1D
-6.46%
1M
25.07%
6M
59.55%
YTD
42.62%
1Y
44.78%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
43.11%
10Y*
25.08%
ALL TIME*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.24M$32.51M$30.51M
$46.42M$43.17M$49.32M

INSW vs. CVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
116.16%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
42.62%51.83%-34.88%11.51%210.18%25.69%-61.31%25.44%-0.80%59.94%

Correlation

The correlation between INSW and CVI is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between INSW and CVI has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSW:

$4.76B

CVI:

$3.58B

EPS

INSW:

$11.00

CVI:

$1.17

PE Ratio

INSW:

8.75

CVI:

30.34

PEG Ratio

INSW:

1.38

CVI:

0.06

PS Ratio

INSW:

7.06

CVI:

0.42

PB Ratio

INSW:

2.18

CVI:

6.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSW:

$675.87M

CVI:

$8.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSW:

$274.33M

CVI:

-$2.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

INSW:

$525.75M

CVI:

$696.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INSW vs. CVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CVI
CVI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INSW vs. CVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INSWCVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.15

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

0.74

+9.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.60

1.55

+28.05

INSW vs. CVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSW Sharpe Ratio is 4.56, which is higher than the CVI Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSW and CVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INSW vs. CVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum CVI drawdown of -92.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and CVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSWCVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-92.39%

+34.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-48.21%

+32.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.40%

-56.17%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.40%

-56.17%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.32%

+9.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-35.04%

+14.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

22.98%

-17.15%

Volatility

INSW vs. CVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) is 13.15%, while CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that INSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSWCVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.15%

17.75%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.53%

40.57%

-11.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.05%

53.74%

-15.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.83%

57.94%

-17.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.33%

59.25%

-13.92%

Dividends

INSW vs. CVI - Dividend Comparison

INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than CVI's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
1.32%8.88%8.00%14.85%32.04%14.28%8.05%7.54%7.25%5.37%7.88%5.08%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
8.66%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

INSW vs. CVI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and CVR Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INSW and CVI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVI has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to INSW (13.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs CVI's -92.39%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSW and CVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer