INSW vs. HOG
INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) and HOG (Harley-Davidson, Inc.) are both stocks. INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while HOG operates in Recreational Vehicles (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, INSW returned 56.61%/yr vs -7.15%/yr for HOG. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
INSW vs. HOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 116.16% return, which is significantly higher than HOG's 21.96% return.
INSW
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 16.72%
- 6M
- 75.93%
- YTD
- 116.16%
- 1Y
- 169.94%
- 3Y*
- 47.43%
- 5Y*
- 56.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.02%
HOG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- -11.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.15%
- 10Y*
- -4.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.79M | $69.95M | $72.29M | |
| $46.42M | $43.17M | $49.32M |
INSW vs. HOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 116.16% | 44.97% | -10.85% | 42.93% | 162.53% | -2.93% | -44.43% | 76.72% | -8.78% | 31.48% |
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 21.96% | -30.05% | -16.61% | -9.76% | 12.13% | 4.29% | 0.19% | 13.62% | -30.54% | -10.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between INSW and HOG is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
INSW:
$4.76B
HOG:
$2.58B
INSW:
$11.00
HOG:
$1.77
INSW:
8.75
HOG:
13.83
INSW:
7.06
HOG:
0.68
INSW:
2.18
HOG:
0.85
INSW:
$675.87M
HOG:
$4.11B
INSW:
$274.33M
HOG:
$982.56M
INSW:
$525.75M
HOG:
$350.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INSW vs. HOG — Risk / Return Rank
INSW
HOG
INSW vs. HOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INSW | HOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.05 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 0.10 | +10.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.60 | 0.18 | +29.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INSW vs. HOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum HOG drawdown of -88.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and HOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSW | HOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -88.26% | +30.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -43.24% | +27.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.40% | -58.74% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.40% | -64.11% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -55.19% | +55.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -24.53% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 23.65% | -17.82% |
Volatility
INSW vs. HOG - Volatility Comparison
International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) at 11.93%. This indicates that INSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INSW | HOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.15% | 11.93% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 29.91% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.05% | 38.90% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.83% | 40.42% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.33% | 42.54% | +2.79% |
Dividends
INSW vs. HOG - Dividend Comparison
INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than HOG's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 3.00% | 3.51% | 2.29% | 1.79% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 4.03% | 4.34% | 2.87% | 2.40% | 2.73% |
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 8.66% | 6.04% | 16.05% | 13.83% | 3.84% | 9.26% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
INSW vs. HOG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and Harley-Davidson, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INSW and HOG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INSW has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to HOG (11.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs HOG's -88.26%.
INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INSW and HOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer