PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SB vs. PLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SB vs. PLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) and Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SB achieves a 33.80% return, which is significantly higher than PLG's -29.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SB has outperformed PLG with an annualized return of 21.11%, while PLG has yielded a comparatively lower -25.33% annualized return.


SB

1D
-1.08%
1M
-9.99%
YTD
33.80%
6M
22.15%
1Y
75.22%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
21.11%

PLG

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-29.66%
6M
-30.54%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
-16.82%
10Y*
-25.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SB vs. PLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
33.80%41.65%-5.15%42.94%-18.68%190.00%-23.53%-4.49%-44.89%180.87%
PLG
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
-29.66%84.37%12.28%-34.48%10.13%-65.95%174.56%13.42%-50.99%-78.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SB and PLG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2008

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SB:

$654.89M

PLG:

$205.29M

EPS

SB:

$0.38

PLG:

-$0.05

PB Ratio

SB:

0.79

PLG:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

SB:

$275.74M

PLG:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

SB:

$99.06M

PLG:

-$67.43K

EBITDA (TTM)

SB:

$134.68M

PLG:

-$5.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SB vs. PLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SB
SB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PLG
PLG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SB vs. PLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) and Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBPLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.08

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

0.08

+5.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.29

0.15

+15.14

SB vs. PLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SB Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the PLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SB and PLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBPLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

0.05

+2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.24

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

-0.32

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.02

-0.06

Drawdowns

SB vs. PLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SB drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, roughly equal to the maximum PLG drawdown of -99.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SB and PLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBPLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.38%

-99.81%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.73%

-54.89%

+40.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.71%

-54.89%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.55%

-76.98%

+24.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.46%

-97.73%

+19.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.94%

-99.64%

+67.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.11%

-68.79%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

29.86%

-24.92%

Volatility

SB vs. PLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) is 13.43%, while Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) has a volatility of 20.03%. This indicates that SB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBPLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.43%

20.03%

-6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.02%

58.85%

-34.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.70%

82.32%

-49.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.19%

71.75%

-29.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.64%

80.11%

-24.47%

Dividends

SB vs. PLG - Dividend Comparison

SB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while PLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLG
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
3.12%4.15%5.60%5.09%6.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.94%

Financials

SB vs. PLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and Platinum Group Metals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
72.57M
0
(SB) Total Revenue
(PLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SB and PLG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLG has higher volatility (20.03%) compared to SB (13.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SB dropped -97.38% vs PLG's -99.81%.

SB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SB and PLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer