PLG vs. COST

In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed COST with an annualized return of -29.10%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.24% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PLG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLG and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.

The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and COST.

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) has a higher volatility of 19.52% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.12%. This indicates that PLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.