SB vs. TRMD
SB (Safe Bulkers, Inc.) and TRMD (TORM plc) are both stocks. SB operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while TRMD operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, SB returned 16.70%/yr vs 42.68%/yr for TRMD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SB vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SB achieves a 35.26% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 51.10% return.
SB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 35.26%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 76.67%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
TRMD
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -12.81%
- YTD
- 51.10%
- 6M
- 38.71%
- 1Y
- 87.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 42.68%
- 10Y*
- —
SB vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 35.26% | 41.65% | -5.15% | 42.94% | -18.68% | 190.00% | -23.53% | -4.49% | -53.28% |
TRMD TORM plc | 51.10% | 11.21% | -23.37% | 31.64% | 297.66% | 12.91% | -25.94% | 84.18% | -22.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SB and TRMD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, SB and TRMD have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SB:
$662.06M
TRMD:
$2.91B
SB:
$0.38
TRMD:
$3.40
SB:
17.18
TRMD:
8.28
SB:
2.40
TRMD:
2.02
SB:
0.80
TRMD:
1.28
SB:
$275.74M
TRMD:
$1.41B
SB:
$99.06M
TRMD:
$575.03M
SB:
$134.68M
TRMD:
$639.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SB vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank
SB
TRMD
SB vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SB | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 4.39 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 11.44 | +4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SB | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.32 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.93 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.48 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
SB vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SB drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than TRMD's maximum drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SB and TRMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SB | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.38% | -60.59% | -36.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -20.06% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.71% | -60.59% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.55% | -60.59% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.19% | -17.33% | -13.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.12% | -22.58% | -40.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 7.69% | -2.82% |
Volatility
SB vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) and TORM plc (TRMD) have volatilities of 14.80% and 14.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SB | TRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.80% | 14.52% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.00% | 27.84% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.68% | 38.07% | -5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.18% | 46.00% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.65% | 59.90% | -4.25% |
Dividends
SB vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison
SB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than TRMD's 8.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 3.09% | 4.15% | 5.60% | 5.09% | 6.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% |
TRMD TORM plc | 8.59% | 10.32% | 30.13% | 23.05% | 6.99% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SB vs. TRMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and TORM plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SB vs. TRMD - Profitability Comparison
SB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.51M and revenue of 72.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.
TRMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 157.74M and revenue of 395.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.
SB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.55M and revenue of 72.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.1%.
TRMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 135.10M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.
SB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a net income of 11.84M and revenue of 72.57M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
TRMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 120.52M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SB and TRMD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SB has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to TRMD (14.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SB dropped -97.38% vs TRMD's -60.59%.
SB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SB and TRMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer