PLG vs. SLVP
PLG (Platinum Group Metals Ltd.) is a stock, while SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, PLG returned -26.75%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLG vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -42.37% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's -9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of -26.75%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
PLG
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -15.53%
- YTD
- -42.37%
- 6M
- -52.11%
- 1Y
- -8.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.49%
- 5Y*
- -18.10%
- 10Y*
- -26.75%
SLVP
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- 78.29%
- 3Y*
- 50.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
PLG vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | -42.37% | 84.37% | 12.28% | -34.48% | 10.13% | -65.95% | 174.56% | 13.42% | -50.99% | -78.74% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.48% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLG and SLVP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, PLG and SLVP have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLG vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
PLG
SLVP
PLG vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLG | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.07 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 5.23 | -5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLG vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLG | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -80.47% | -19.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.07% | -38.06% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.07% | -38.06% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.19% | -48.01% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | -62.03% | -35.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -34.70% | -65.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.84% | -46.75% | -22.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.35% | 15.00% | +17.35% |
Volatility
PLG vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) has a higher volatility of 24.75% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 19.48%. This indicates that PLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLG | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | 19.48% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.53% | 45.96% | +14.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.92% | 55.40% | +27.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.19% | 43.31% | +28.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.29% | 42.55% | +37.74% |
Dividends
PLG vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
PLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLG and SLVP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLG has higher volatility (24.75%) compared to SLVP (19.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLG dropped -99.81% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLG and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer