SB vs. ASC
SB (Safe Bulkers, Inc.) and ASC (Ardmore Shipping Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SB returned 24.44%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for ASC. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SB vs. ASC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SB achieves a 64.83% return, which is significantly lower than ASC's 69.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SB has outperformed ASC with an annualized return of 24.44%, while ASC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.
SB
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 22.03%
- 6M
- 39.14%
- YTD
- 64.83%
- 1Y
- 107.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.09%
- 5Y*
- 23.78%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.91%
ASC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 38.61%
- YTD
- 69.11%
- 1Y
- 70.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 42.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.27M | $9.31M | $11.54M | |
| $6.69M | $6.75M | $5.74M |
SB vs. ASC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 64.83% | 41.65% | -5.15% | 42.94% | -18.68% | 190.00% | -23.53% | -4.49% | -44.89% | 180.87% |
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 69.11% | -10.36% | -8.18% | 5.81% | 326.33% | 3.36% | -63.57% | 93.79% | -41.63% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SB and ASC is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.39 |
The correlation between SB and ASC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SB:
$795.27M
ASC:
$709.56M
SB:
$0.85
ASC:
$2.67
SB:
9.17
ASC:
6.50
SB:
2.59
ASC:
1.93
SB:
0.91
ASC:
1.02
SB:
$307.50M
ASC:
$368.29M
SB:
$136.03M
ASC:
$139.43M
SB:
$167.78M
ASC:
$146.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SB vs. ASC — Risk / Return Rank
SB
ASC
SB vs. ASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SB | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.27 | 2.48 | +4.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.31 | 6.24 | +13.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SB vs. ASC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SB drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than ASC's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SB and ASC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SB | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.38% | -80.11% | -17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -27.10% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.71% | -61.41% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.55% | -61.41% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.46% | -71.21% | -7.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.15% | -17.20% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.78% | -38.79% | -23.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 10.76% | -5.22% |
Volatility
SB vs. ASC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) is 10.85%, while Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that SB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SB | ASC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.85% | 12.68% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.29% | 30.55% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.74% | 38.34% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.35% | 45.58% | -4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.11% | 51.12% | +3.99% |
Dividends
SB vs. ASC - Dividend Comparison
SB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than ASC's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 3.74% | 2.83% | 8.89% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 4.80% |
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 2.69% | 4.15% | 5.60% | 5.09% | 6.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% |
Financials
SB vs. ASC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SB vs. ASC - Profitability Comparison
SB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.04M and revenue of 87.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.2%.
ASC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.55M and revenue of 116.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.8%.
SB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.91M and revenue of 87.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.1%.
ASC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported an operating income of 49.78M and revenue of 116.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.8%.
SB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a net income of 35.16M and revenue of 87.46M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.
ASC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a net income of 60.51M and revenue of 116.21M, resulting in a net margin of 52.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SB and ASC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASC has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to SB (10.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SB dropped -97.38% vs ASC's -80.11%.
SB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SB and ASC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer