SB vs. SBLK
SB (Safe Bulkers, Inc.) and SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SB returned 23.71%/yr vs 32.55%/yr for SBLK. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SB vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SB achieves a 49.69% return, which is significantly higher than SBLK's 45.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SB has underperformed SBLK with an annualized return of 23.71%, while SBLK has yielded a comparatively higher 32.55% annualized return.
SB
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 8.98%
- YTD
- 49.69%
- 6M
- 50.00%
- 1Y
- 98.17%
- 3Y*
- 35.80%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 23.71%
SBLK
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 45.28%
- 6M
- 47.82%
- 1Y
- 70.08%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 32.55%
SB vs. SBLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 49.69% | 41.65% | -5.15% | 42.94% | -18.68% | 190.00% | -23.53% | -4.49% | -44.89% | 180.87% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 45.28% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 185.15% | -24.77% | 29.82% | -18.83% | 120.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SB and SBLK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2008 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SB and SBLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SB:
$731.51M
SBLK:
$3.02B
SB:
$0.52
SBLK:
$1.25
SB:
13.69
SBLK:
21.63
SB:
2.56
SBLK:
2.81
SB:
0.87
SBLK:
1.24
SB:
$285.78M
SBLK:
$1.09B
SB:
$111.18M
SBLK:
$377.07M
SB:
$142.81M
SBLK:
$377.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SB vs. SBLK — Risk / Return Rank
SB
SBLK
SB vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SB | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.37 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.70 | 4.03 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.92 | 11.15 | +7.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SB vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SB drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, roughly equal to the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SB and SBLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SB | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.38% | -99.76% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -17.49% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.71% | -48.44% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.55% | -48.44% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.46% | -73.77% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.85% | -93.44% | +69.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.01% | -82.70% | +19.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 6.30% | -1.09% |
Volatility
SB vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) has a higher volatility of 14.78% compared to Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) at 9.39%. This indicates that SB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SB | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.78% | 9.39% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.92% | 22.94% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.56% | 29.65% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.85% | 42.86% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.35% | 52.44% | +2.91% |
Dividends
SB vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison
SB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than SBLK's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SB Safe Bulkers, Inc. | 2.09% | 4.15% | 5.60% | 5.09% | 6.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.82% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SB vs. SBLK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safe Bulkers, Inc. and Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SB vs. SBLK - Profitability Comparison
SB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 33.69M and revenue of 74.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.3%.
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 92.95M and revenue of 281.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
SB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.47M and revenue of 74.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.6%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 73.02M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
SB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Safe Bulkers, Inc. reported a net income of 22.21M and revenue of 74.39M, resulting in a net margin of 29.9%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 58.53M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SB and SBLK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SB has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to SBLK (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SB dropped -97.38% vs SBLK's -99.76%.
SB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SB and SBLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer