PLG vs. PPLT
PLG (Platinum Group Metals Ltd.) is a stock, while PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM. Over the past 10 years, PLG returned -26.75%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLG vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -42.37% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's -19.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed PPLT with an annualized return of -26.75%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.70% annualized return.
PLG
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -15.53%
- YTD
- -42.37%
- 6M
- -52.11%
- 1Y
- -8.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.49%
- 5Y*
- -18.10%
- 10Y*
- -26.75%
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- -19.76%
- 6M
- -28.09%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
PLG vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | -42.37% | 84.37% | 12.28% | -34.48% | 10.13% | -65.95% | 174.56% | 13.42% | -50.99% | -78.74% |
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -19.76% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLG and PPLT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, PLG and PPLT have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLG vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
PLG
PPLT
PLG vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLG | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.67 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 1.48 | -1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLG vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLG | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -70.73% | -29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.07% | -40.69% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.07% | -40.69% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.19% | -40.69% | -33.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | -51.14% | -46.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -40.69% | -59.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.84% | -39.93% | -28.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.35% | 18.34% | +14.01% |
Volatility
PLG vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) has a higher volatility of 24.75% compared to abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 11.41%. This indicates that PLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLG | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | 11.41% | +13.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.53% | 45.28% | +15.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.92% | 50.70% | +32.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.19% | 32.68% | +39.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.29% | 29.18% | +51.11% |
Dividends
PLG vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLG nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLG and PPLT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLG has higher volatility (24.75%) compared to PPLT (11.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLG dropped -99.81% vs PPLT's -70.73%.
PPLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLG and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer