PLG vs. PPLT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT).

PPLT is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010.

Performance

PLG vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLG vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd.	-25.00%	84.37%	12.28%	-34.48%	10.13%	-65.95%	174.56%	13.42%	-50.99%	-78.74%
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF	-4.40%	124.48%	-8.90%	-8.18%	10.43%	-10.75%	10.78%	20.85%	-14.95%	2.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -25.00% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's -4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed PPLT with an annualized return of -26.54%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.81% annualized return.

PLG

• 1D: 9.26%
• 1M: -35.87%
• YTD: -25.00%
• 6M: -33.21%
• 1Y: 42.74%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: -15.09%
• 10Y*: -26.54%

PPLT

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -17.00%
• YTD: -4.40%
• 6M: 24.74%
• 1Y: 95.06%
• 3Y*: 24.69%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: 6.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PLG vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLG

PLG Risk / Return Rank: 61
PLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PLG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PLG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

PPLT

PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 87
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLG vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLG	PPLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	1.95	-1.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	2.20	-0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	2.85	-1.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.17	8.64	-6.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLG vs. PPLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the PPLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLG and PPLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLG	PPLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51	1.95	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.30	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.33	0.24	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.03	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between PLG and PPLT is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PLG vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLG nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLG vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and PPLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLG	PPLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.81%	-70.73%	-29.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.74%	-34.41%	-19.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.57%	-34.74%	-46.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.73%	-51.14%	-46.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.62%	-29.34%	-70.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.56%	-40.08%	-28.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.84%	11.36%	+10.48%

Volatility

PLG vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison

Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) has a higher volatility of 23.70% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 16.06%. This indicates that PLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLG	PPLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.70%	16.06%	+7.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.00%	44.64%	+22.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.32%	49.13%	+35.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.25%	32.03%	+40.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.70%	28.73%	+51.97%