SAWS vs. SCHA
SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SAWS is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past year, SAWS returned 25.24% vs 47.65% for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAWS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SAWS vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 11.07% return.
SAWS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 47.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
SAWS vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 7.63% | 7.26% | 3.52% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 11.07% | 11.60% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAWS and SCHA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SAWS and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAWS vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SAWS
SCHA
SAWS vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAWS | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.58 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 3.56 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 4.85 | -2.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 17.82 | -9.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAWS | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.58 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
SAWS vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and SCHA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAWS | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -42.41% | +20.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -9.50% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | 0.00% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -7.64% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.59% | +0.45% |
Volatility
SAWS vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 7.20% and 6.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAWS | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 6.87% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 13.45% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 18.71% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.99% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 22.67% | -1.41% |
SAWS vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAWS vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SCHA's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |