SAWS vs. FSMD
SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SAWS is actively managed, while FSMD is passively managed. Over the past year, SAWS returned 25.24% vs 31.58% for FSMD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAWS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FSMD.
Performance
SAWS vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 8.52% return.
SAWS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSMD
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SAWS vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 7.63% | 7.26% | 3.52% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 8.52% | 8.70% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAWS and FSMD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SAWS and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAWS vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank
SAWS
FSMD
SAWS vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAWS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.02 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 2.90 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.55 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 12.72 | -4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAWS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.02 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SAWS vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and FSMD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAWS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -40.67% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -8.44% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -0.52% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -6.10% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.35% | +0.69% |
Volatility
SAWS vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 6.41%. This indicates that SAWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAWS | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 6.41% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 11.34% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 15.82% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 18.48% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.52% | -0.26% |
SAWS vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAWS vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison
SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FSMD's 1.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.28% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% |