SARO vs. CRML

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about StandardAero, Inc (SARO) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML).

Performance

SARO vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StandardAero, Inc (SARO) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SARO vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SARO StandardAero, Inc	-9.94%	15.83%	-24.40%
CRML Critical Metals Corp	14.41%	2.21%	-0.15%

Fundamentals

EPS SARO : $0.83 CRML : -$0.53
PS Ratio SARO : 1.42 CRML : 1.38K
Total Revenue (TTM) SARO : $6.06B CRML : $560.62K
Gross Profit (TTM) SARO : $922.06M CRML : $560.62K
EBITDA (TTM) SARO : $696.40M CRML : -$47.47M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SARO achieves a -9.94% return, which is significantly lower than CRML's 14.41% return.

SARO

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -16.14%
• YTD: -9.94%
• 6M: -5.35%
• 1Y: -3.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRML

• 1D: 19.04%
• 1M: -21.77%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 27.65%
• 1Y: 471.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SARO vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SARO

SARO Risk / Return Rank: 34
SARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SARO Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SARO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SARO vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StandardAero, Inc (SARO) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SARO	CRML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	2.67	-2.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	3.53	-3.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.38	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	6.01	-6.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	9.99	-10.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SARO vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SARO Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SARO and CRML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SARO	CRML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	2.67	-2.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-0.25	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SARO and CRML is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SARO vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

Neither SARO nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SARO vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SARO drawdown since its inception was -32.58%, smaller than the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARO and CRML.

Drawdown Indicators

	SARO	CRML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.58%	-93.91%	+61.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.85%	-77.74%	+53.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.01%	-73.51%	+51.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.77%	-68.66%	+53.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.53%	46.77%	-35.24%

Volatility

SARO vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for StandardAero, Inc (SARO) is 10.63%, while Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a volatility of 31.02%. This indicates that SARO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SARO	CRML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	31.02%	-20.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.91%	124.55%	-101.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.45%	177.77%	-143.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.25%	158.24%	-122.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.25%	158.24%	-122.99%

Financials