SARK vs. ISCG
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while ISCG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. SARK is actively managed, while ISCG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -30.30%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for ISCG. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCG.
Performance
SARK vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 13.97% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- -19.94%
- 3Y*
- -30.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCG
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
SARK vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.20% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 13.97% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -8.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and ISCG is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | -0.83 |
The correlation between SARK and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
ISCG
SARK vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 2.67 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 10.16 | -11.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and ISCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -57.72% | -23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.61% | -11.43% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -26.71% | -47.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.29% | -1.18% | -78.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.79% | -11.60% | -35.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.99% | 3.00% | +12.99% |
Volatility
SARK vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 5.89%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 5.89% | +6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.66% | 13.68% | +12.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.83% | 18.61% | +17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.15% | 23.03% | +33.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.15% | 23.17% | +32.98% |
SARK vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than ISCG's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.00% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and ISCG have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to ISCG (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs ISCG's -57.72%.
On 3-year performance, ISCG leads with 17.43% vs -30.30% for SARK. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 17.43% return vs -30.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SARK.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.59% for ISCG.
SARK is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ISCG is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.06% for ISCG.
ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and ISCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer