SARK vs. SH
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. SARK is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -24.59%/yr vs -10.94%/yr for SH. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
SARK vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SARK achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -6.65% return.
SARK
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 13.13%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- -10.99%
- 3Y*
- -24.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.17%
SH
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- -10.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- -12.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.94M | $4.74M | $6.45M | |
| $271.72M | $244.09M | $301.56M |
SARK vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 0.17% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.65% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and SH is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SARK and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
SH
SARK vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.86 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.73 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | -1.30 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SARK vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -94.66% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.34% | -16.06% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -38.82% | -35.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.89% | -94.54% | +16.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -67.93% | +20.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 9.03% | +6.41% |
Volatility
SARK vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 3.51%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 3.51% | +6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | 10.08% | +17.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.55% | 12.81% | +23.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.75% | 16.96% | +38.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.75% | 18.02% | +37.73% |
SARK vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than SH's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 2.81% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.19% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and SH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to SH (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 3-year performance, SH leads with -10.94% vs -24.59% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SH has performed better with a -10.94% return vs -24.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 2.81% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.89% for SH.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer