SARK vs. SH
SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. SARK is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SARK returned -31.26%/yr vs -13.22%/yr for SH. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SARK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
SARK vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SARK having a -8.86% return and SH slightly higher at -8.64%.
SARK
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -8.86%
- 6M
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -31.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- -18.28%
- 3Y*
- -13.22%
- 5Y*
- -9.35%
- 10Y*
- -12.95%
SARK vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -8.86% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 20.78% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.64% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SARK and SH is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SARK and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SARK vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
SARK
SH
SARK vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | -1.56 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | -2.25 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.76 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -1.02 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -1.91 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | -1.56 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | -0.59 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
SARK vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SARK drawdown since its inception was -81.07%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SARK and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.07% | -94.66% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.75% | -18.28% | -22.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.42% | -38.82% | -35.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.88% | -94.66% | +14.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.43% | -67.72% | +21.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.38% | 9.83% | +20.55% |
Volatility
SARK vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.75%. This indicates that SARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SARK | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 2.75% | +6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.07% | 8.90% | +16.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.86% | 11.78% | +24.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.25% | 16.85% | +39.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.25% | 18.01% | +38.24% |
SARK vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SARK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SARK vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than SH's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.09% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.54% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SARK and SH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to SH (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SARK dropped -81.07% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 3-year performance, SH leads with -13.22% vs -31.26% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SH has performed better with a -13.22% return vs -31.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.09% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SARK and 0.90% for SH.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.01 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SARK and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer