SAEF vs. SCHV
SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAEF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. SAEF is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAEF returned 13.25%/yr vs 18.86%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
SAEF vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return.
SAEF
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
SAEF vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 9.41% | 2.31% | 16.14% | 17.87% | -18.29% | -2.35% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEF and SCHV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SAEF and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAEF vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAEF
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SAEF
SCHV
Industrials
SAEF
SCHV
Financial Services
SAEF
SCHV
Technology
SAEF
SCHV
Healthcare
SAEF
SCHV
Communication Services
SAEF
SCHV
Real Estate
SAEF
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
SAEF
SCHV
Basic Materials
SAEF
SCHV
Energy
SAEF
-
SCHV
Utilities
SAEF
-
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEF vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
SAEF
SCHV
SAEF vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEF | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.48 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 4.19 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 16.96 | -11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEF | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.69 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.72 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
SAEF vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEF | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.05% | -37.08% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | -6.83% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.40% | -15.26% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -3.83% | -6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 1.69% | +3.04% |
Volatility
SAEF vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 3.09%. This indicates that SAEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEF | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.09% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 8.13% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 10.63% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 14.51% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 16.94% | +4.46% |
SAEF vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEF vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.61% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEF and SCHV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAEF has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEF dropped -28.05% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 3-year performance, SCHV leads with 18.86% vs 13.25% for SAEF. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 18.86% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.34% for SAEF.
SAEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAEF and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer