SAEF vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAEF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. SAEF is actively managed, while VONG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAEF returned 14.04%/yr vs 22.53%/yr for VONG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

SAEF vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 3.18% return.

SAEF

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: 26.64%
• 3Y*: 14.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VONG

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 21.21%
• 3Y*: 22.53%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: 18.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEF vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF	13.56%	2.31%	16.14%	17.87%	-18.29%	-2.31%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	3.18%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEF and VONG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.70

The correlation between SAEF and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SAEF vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAEF	VONG
Consumer Cyclical	22.6%	12.5%
Industrials	20.3%	4.9%
Financial Services	15.0%	4.8%
Technology	14.7%	54.1%
Healthcare	10.0%	6.9%
Communication Services	7.5%	12.0%
Real Estate	4.5%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	2.5%
Basic Materials	2.3%	0.3%
Energy	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

SAEF vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEF

SAEF Risk / Return Rank: 41
SAEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SAEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SAEF Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SAEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SAEF Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 34
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEF vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAEF	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.32	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.83	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.31	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.65	4.30	+1.36

SAEF vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEF and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAEF vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAEF	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.05%	-32.72%	+4.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-16.23%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.40%	-23.27%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.33%	+5.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-4.88%	-5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	4.95%	-0.23%

Volatility

SAEF vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) is 4.90%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that SAEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAEF	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	5.86%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.26%	12.54%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	16.12%	+2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.38%	21.44%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.38%	20.94%	+0.44%

SAEF vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAEF vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VONG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF	0.33%	0.38%	0.46%	0.46%	0.61%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.46%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAEF and VONG in my portfolio?

SAEF and VONG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAEF or VONG?

VONG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to SAEF (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEF dropped -28.05% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, SAEF or VONG?

On 3-year performance, VONG leads with 22.53% vs 14.04% for SAEF. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SAEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAEF or VONG?

Over the 3-year period, VONG has performed better with a 22.53% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAEF or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAEF or VONG?

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.33% for SAEF.

What is the main difference between SAEF and VONG?

SAEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.