SAEF vs. SCHK
SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAEF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHK is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index. SAEF is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAEF returned 14.04%/yr vs 21.32%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
SAEF vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 10.10% return.
SAEF
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
SAEF vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 13.56% | 2.31% | 16.14% | 17.87% | -18.29% | -2.31% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 10.10% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEF and SCHK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SAEF and SCHK shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SAEF vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAEF
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SAEF
SCHK
Industrials
SAEF
SCHK
Financial Services
SAEF
SCHK
Technology
SAEF
SCHK
Healthcare
SAEF
SCHK
Communication Services
SAEF
SCHK
Real Estate
SAEF
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
SAEF
SCHK
Basic Materials
SAEF
SCHK
Energy
SAEF
-
SCHK
Utilities
SAEF
-
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEF vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
SAEF
SCHK
SAEF vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAEF | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.98 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 13.32 | -7.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAEF vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEF | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.05% | -34.80% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | -8.97% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.40% | -19.21% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.59% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -5.16% | -5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 2.00% | +2.72% |
Volatility
SAEF vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 4.90% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEF | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 4.74% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 10.01% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 12.77% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 17.33% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 19.12% | +2.26% |
SAEF vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEF vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than SCHK's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 0.33% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.61% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEF and SCHK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAEF has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to SCHK (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEF dropped -28.05% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 3-year performance, SCHK leads with 21.32% vs 14.04% for SAEF. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 21.32% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.33% for SAEF.
SAEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHK is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.03% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAEF and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer