SAEF vs. VOO
SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAEF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. SAEF is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAEF returned 14.04%/yr vs 21.36%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SAEF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.
SAEF
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
SAEF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 13.56% | 2.31% | 16.14% | 17.87% | -18.29% | -2.31% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEF and VOO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SAEF and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SAEF vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAEF
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SAEF
VOO
Industrials
SAEF
VOO
Financial Services
SAEF
VOO
Technology
SAEF
VOO
Healthcare
SAEF
VOO
Communication Services
SAEF
VOO
Real Estate
SAEF
VOO
Consumer Defensive
SAEF
VOO
Basic Materials
SAEF
VOO
Energy
SAEF
-
VOO
Utilities
SAEF
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SAEF
VOO
SAEF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAEF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.02 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 13.58 | -7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAEF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.05% | -33.99% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | -8.90% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.40% | -18.69% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.74% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -3.68% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 1.98% | +2.74% |
Volatility
SAEF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that SAEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 4.60% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 9.73% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.94% | 12.39% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 16.90% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 18.05% | +3.33% |
SAEF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF | 0.33% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.61% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEF and VOO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAEF has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEF dropped -28.05% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 21.36% vs 14.04% for SAEF. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 21.36% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.33% for SAEF.
SAEF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAEF and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer