SAA vs. MIDU
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%) while MIDU tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SAA returned 12.47%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for MIDU. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAA charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MIDU.
Performance
SAA vs. MIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 37.82% return, which is significantly lower than MIDU's 41.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SAA having a 12.47% annualized return and MIDU not far ahead at 12.76%.
SAA
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 37.82%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 65.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
MIDU
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 41.54%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 66.94%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
SAA vs. MIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 37.82% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 41.54% | -2.75% | 20.32% | 27.79% | -49.27% | 72.89% | -18.31% | 77.38% | -39.21% | 46.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and MIDU is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SAA and MIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAA vs. MIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAA
MIDU
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SAA
MIDU
Industrials
SAA
MIDU
Technology
SAA
MIDU
Consumer Cyclical
SAA
MIDU
Healthcare
SAA
MIDU
Real Estate
SAA
MIDU
Energy
SAA
MIDU
Basic Materials
SAA
MIDU
Communication Services
SAA
MIDU
Consumer Defensive
SAA
MIDU
Utilities
SAA
MIDU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. MIDU — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
MIDU
SAA vs. MIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAA | MIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 2.61 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.75 | 8.65 | +3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAA vs. MIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, roughly equal to the maximum MIDU drawdown of -86.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and MIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | MIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -86.26% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -25.80% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | -60.41% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -64.14% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | -86.26% | +11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -22.41% | -4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 7.77% | -2.17% |
Volatility
SAA vs. MIDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) is 9.77%, while Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that SAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | MIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 15.07% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | 34.90% | -10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.26% | 47.43% | -11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.58% | 59.59% | -16.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 63.65% | -17.50% |
SAA vs. MIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAA vs. MIDU - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than MIDU's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.63% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.71% | 0.70% | 2.67% | 1.89% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.73% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SAA and MIDU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MIDU has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to SAA (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs MIDU's -86.26%.
On 10-year performance, MIDU leads with 12.76% vs 12.47% for SAA. On fees, SAA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 9.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MIDU has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SAA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.
SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.63% for MIDU.
SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 1.06% for MIDU.
SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAA and MIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer