PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAA vs. MIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAA vs. MIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 40.69% return, which is significantly higher than MIDU's 34.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has outperformed MIDU with an annualized return of 11.73%, while MIDU has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.


SAA

1D
-1.26%
1M
2.42%
6M
23.30%
YTD
40.69%
1Y
58.53%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
11.73%
ALL TIME*
9.34%

MIDU

1D
-2.52%
1M
-4.35%
6M
13.38%
YTD
34.47%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
10.70%
ALL TIME*
21.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAA vs. MIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
40.69%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
34.47%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and MIDU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.89

The correlation between SAA and MIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAA vs. MIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAA
MIDU

Financial Services

17.1%
13.9%

Industrials

15.6%
25.3%

Technology

15.5%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

12.4%
8.9%

Real Estate

7.6%
7.3%

Energy

4.7%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.5%

Utilities

1.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

SAA
17.1%
MIDU
13.9%

Industrials

SAA
15.6%
MIDU
25.3%

Technology

SAA
15.5%
MIDU
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SAA
13.2%
MIDU
10.5%

Healthcare

SAA
12.4%
MIDU
8.9%

Real Estate

SAA
7.6%
MIDU
7.3%

Energy

SAA
4.7%
MIDU
4.6%

Basic Materials

SAA
4.7%
MIDU
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SAA
4.2%
MIDU
3.2%

Communication Services

SAA
3.2%
MIDU
1.5%

Utilities

SAA
1.8%
MIDU
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAA vs. MIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAA vs. MIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAAMIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.18

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.69

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

5.54

+4.97

SAA vs. MIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the MIDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and MIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAA vs. MIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, roughly equal to the maximum MIDU drawdown of -86.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and MIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAMIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-86.26%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-25.80%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.84%

-60.41%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-64.14%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

-86.26%

+11.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-9.11%

+4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-22.31%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

7.87%

-2.28%

Volatility

SAA vs. MIDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) is 7.48%, while Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that SAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAMIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

10.31%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

34.74%

-10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.47%

47.11%

-11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.28%

59.24%

-15.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.01%

63.46%

-17.45%

SAA vs. MIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAA vs. MIDU - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than MIDU's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.53%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.77%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SAA and MIDU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIDU has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to SAA (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs MIDU's -86.26%.

On 10-year performance, SAA leads with 11.73% vs 10.70% for MIDU. On fees, SAA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SAA has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SAA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.53% for MIDU.

SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 1.06% for MIDU.

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAA and MIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer