SAA vs. EFO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%) while EFO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SAA returned 11.77%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for EFO. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SAA vs. EFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 40.60% return, which is significantly higher than EFO's 18.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has outperformed EFO with an annualized return of 11.77%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.

SAA

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -1.90%
• 6M: 26.90%
• YTD: 40.60%
• 1Y: 69.35%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 4.55%
• 10Y*: 11.77%
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

EFO

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 8.37%
• YTD: 18.24%
• 1Y: 44.10%
• 3Y*: 23.54%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 10.93%
• ALL TIME*: 8.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	$261.38K	$262.27K	$430.81K
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	$74.40K	$123.70K	$201.98K

SAA vs. EFO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	40.60%	0.29%	5.60%	21.32%	-36.17%	51.77%	-1.79%	42.39%	-23.00%	23.94%
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	18.24%	58.51%	-2.15%	25.77%	-33.62%	19.38%	2.29%	40.93%	-30.91%	51.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and EFO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009	0.61

The correlation between SAA and EFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAA vs. EFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAA	EFO
Financial Services	17.1%	41.2%
Industrials	15.6%	-
Technology	15.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	-
Healthcare	12.4%	-
Real Estate	7.6%	-
Energy	4.7%	-
Basic Materials	4.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	-
Communication Services	3.2%	-
Utilities	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

SAA vs. EFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAA

SAA Risk / Return Rank: 81
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

EFO

EFO Risk / Return Rank: 56
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAA vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAA	EFO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.36	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	1.96	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.24	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	1.95	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.78	6.65	+5.13

SAA vs. EFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the EFO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and EFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAA vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and EFO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAA	EFO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.39%	-63.52%	-23.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.21%	-22.18%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.84%	-26.85%	-23.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.37%	-53.95%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.54%	-63.52%	-11.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.60%	-1.05%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.22%	-18.53%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	6.49%	-0.99%

Volatility

SAA vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) is 6.98%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that SAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAA	EFO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.98%	9.36%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.54%	27.57%	-4.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.44%	31.88%	+3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.23%	33.25%	+9.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.01%	33.58%	+12.43%

SAA vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SAA and EFO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SAA vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than EFO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	1.57%	1.65%	2.24%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600	0.77%	1.05%	1.36%	0.88%	0.46%	0.00%	0.03%	0.35%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAA and EFO in my portfolio?

SAA and EFO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAA or EFO?

EFO has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to SAA (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs EFO's -63.52%.

Which ETF is better, SAA or EFO?

On 10-year performance, SAA leads with 11.77% vs 10.93% for EFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAA or EFO?

Over the 10-year period, SAA has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAA or EFO?

SAA and EFO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAA or EFO?

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.77% for SAA.

What is the main difference between SAA and EFO?

SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.