PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 40.60% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.77%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


SAA

1D
-0.46%
1M
-1.90%
6M
26.90%
YTD
40.60%
1Y
69.35%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
11.77%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.40K$123.70K$201.98K
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

SAA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
40.60%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and VOO is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.75

The correlation between SAA and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAA
VOO

Financial Services

17.1%
11.4%

Industrials

15.6%
8.5%

Technology

15.5%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
9.5%

Healthcare

12.4%
8.9%

Real Estate

7.6%
1.8%

Energy

4.7%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
9.9%

Utilities

1.8%
2.2%

Financial Services

SAA
17.1%
VOO
11.4%

Industrials

SAA
15.6%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

SAA
15.5%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SAA
13.2%
VOO
9.5%

Healthcare

SAA
12.4%
VOO
8.9%

Real Estate

SAA
7.6%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

SAA
4.7%
VOO
3.0%

Basic Materials

SAA
4.7%
VOO
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

SAA
4.2%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

SAA
3.2%
VOO
9.9%

Utilities

SAA
1.8%
VOO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAAVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

2.21

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

9.44

+2.34

SAA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-33.99%

-53.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-8.90%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.84%

-18.69%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-24.52%

-30.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

-33.99%

-40.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-1.38%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.22%

-3.67%

-23.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

2.08%

+3.42%

Volatility

SAA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

3.54%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.54%

10.10%

+13.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.44%

12.82%

+22.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.23%

16.93%

+26.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.01%

18.01%

+28.00%

SAA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.77%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAA and VOO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAA has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 11.77% for SAA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.77% for SAA.

SAA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.03% for VOO.

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer